I was once again reminded that what we think we are clearly communicating may not be what another is actually hearing. A Texan and New Yorker were talking about a planned utility company power outage that would impact a local hotel where I was hosting an event for 300. The Texan heard that the hotel could be without power for 48 hours and immediately shared the news that our event might be in jeopardy. The New Yorker had actually said that it would be 4 to 8 hours. I was quickly able to clarify the time frame with the hotel and reassure my colleagues. Fortunately, the outage was less than the planned maximun of 8 hours, with no impact to my event.
What if the misunderstanding had been about medical treatment? Health impact could be severe if a patient or care giver heard instructions to seek medical attention if symptoms worsened in 48 hours, but the doctor had actually said to act quickly in 4 to 8 hours.
When understanding details is important it is a good practice to repeat what we think we have heard.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment